Submitted by leopoldstoch
Posted 1 year ago
Hot since 1 year ago
this is so fucked up; it's seriously like "let's have the poor people compete for money!" yeah sure one person gets some money but think about what this would actually be. all the people with homes and well-financed lives sit in their well-lit living rooms watching a television show of starving, suffering people in a contest to see which one can make us the most entertained
Posted 9 months ago
Yeah, you're right. It's better to just keep the money and the couple weeks worth of shelter in the hands of people who have probably never known a hardship in their life. [/sarcasm]
the main reason it wouldn't work is because that the homeless people would be grateful for the place to stay and the food. They wouldn't run around having sex everywhere and acting like total assholes
I agree with FredricYabado, it will be a horrible feeling when they lose... but atleast they get a place to sleep and eat for 60-70 days!
Not all homeless people are drug addicts madkock99...and one more thing addicted addicts. Seriously? Buy yourself a dictionary.
I feel special that I am one of those people that liked that post
I think this is a way better idea than having stuck up celebrities on the show, would actually watch it then.
Yes get a load of crazy drug addicted addicts on a tv show to fight each other completely different from big brother currently
And then when they lose.. just chuck them back onto the streets! Brilliant idea..
In fairness they will get enough exposure to probably get a little money, maybe from a photoshoot or magazine article, which could help them off their feet, to maybe put a deposit down on a flat and would help them secure a job. I think this idea is brilliant.
It wouldn't work. People want to see beautiful people doing beautiful people things. A photo shoot of homeless people? I don't think any photography company would invest in that. Bedraggled, missing teeth sometimes, poor hygiene equates to 'Not-Niceness'
© 2012-2013 tickld